Police Discipline

Overview

The Civilian Office of Police Accountability (COPA), the Police Department, and the Police Board have different roles. The responsibility to receive complaints of alleged misconduct by Chicago police officers rests with COPA.  Depending on the nature of the allegations, either COPA or the Police Department's Bureau of Internal Affairs will investigate the complaint.  The Board’s role is to decide those disciplinary matters that are filed with the Board.

For more information, watch this video in English or Spanish.

The Police Board's Role

The Police Board decides disciplinary matters involving allegations of serious misconduct made against members of the Chicago Police Department. The Board has the responsibility to:

  • Decide cases when the Superintendent of Police files charges to discharge a police officer from the Chicago Police Department; and
  • Rule on matters in which the Chief Administrator of the Civilian Office of Police Accountability and the Superintendent of Police do not agree regarding discipline of a police officer.

See Allegations of Police Misconduct: A Guide to the Complaint and Disciplinary Process and other Police Board publications for detailed information.

Police Board Decisions

Section 2-84-030 of the Municipal Code of Chicago requires the Police Board to post on this website its Findings and Decisions in disciplinary cases.  Below are the Findings and Decisions decided in:

Go to the Archives for the Findings and Decisions of cases decided in previous years.

Reports and Data on Police Board Cases

Cases Currently Before the Police Board

Currently before the Police Board are the following cases in which the Superintendent of Police has filed charges against a member of the Chicago Police Department (unless otherwise noted below, the Superintendent recommended that the member be discharged from the Chicago Police Department). A copy of the charges filed in a particular case is available by clicking on the case number below. (The public is reminded that the filing of charges is not evidence of guilt. The accused officer is presumed innocent and is entitled to a fair hearing at which the Superintendent has the burden of proving guilt by a preponderance of the evidence.)

The hearings are open to the public. (Contact Police Board Executive Administrative Assistant Jazmyne Rollins at Jazmyne.Rollins@cityofchicago.org if you would like information on how to attend a hearing.) An evidentiary hearing resembles a trial in court, although not as formal; the typical case includes opening statements, witness testimony, and closing arguments. (The Board has entered an Order on holding evidentiary hearings via Zoom.) Status hearings typically include the attorneys and the hearing officer addressing various issues in preparation for the evidentiary hearing. TUA = Taken under advisement (the evidentiary hearing is complete and a decision will be forthcoming).

Case Number:  Description of Primary Charges--Next Hearing Date

No. 23 PB 3013: Domestic incident off duty--September 5 - 6 at 9:30am each day (evidentiary hearing)

No. 23 PB 3014: Domestic incident off duty: April 29 - May 1 at 9:30am each day (evidentiary hearing)

No. 23 PB 3016: De-certified as a law enforcement officer due to felony conviction--March 11 at 9:00am (status hearing)

No. 23 PB 3017: Used deadly force without justification--TUA

No. 23 PB 3018: Used deadly force without justification while off duty--March 25 at 9:30am (status hearing)

No. 23 PB 3019: Used deadly force without justification--TUA

No. 23 PB 3020: Tested positive for an illegal drug--TUA

No. 23 PB 3022: Disobeyed order to comply with COVID-19 policy--April 10 at 9:00am (status hearing)

No. 23 PB 3024: Disobeyed order to comply with COVID-19 policy--April 10 at 9:00am (status hearing)

No. 23 PB 3025: Used deadly force without justification--August 5 - 9 at 10:00am each day (evidentiary hearing)

No. 23 PB 3026: Conduct unbecoming an officer while off duty: Next date to be determined

No. 23 PB 3027: Domestic incidents off duty--April 10 at 10:00am (status hearing)

No. 23 PB 3029: Use of excessive force while off duty (366-day suspension recommended)--May 20 at 9:00am (evidentiary hearing)

No. 23 PB 3030: Used deadly force without justification--June 4 - 7 at 9:30am each day (evidentiary hearing)

No. 23 PB 3031: Verbal abuse and failure to perform duty—July 15 - 17 at 10:00am each day (evidentiary hearing)

No. 23 PB 3032: Domestic altercations off duty—April 9 and 11 at 9:00am each day (evidentiary hearing)

No. 23 PB 3033: Improper searches—October 7 - 9 at 9:30am each day (evidentiary hearing)

No. 23 PB 3034: Disobeyed order to comply with COVID-19 policy—April 10 at 9:00am (status hearing)

No. 23 PB 3035: Failed to report misconduct and made false statement--March 11 at 8:45am (status hearing)

No. 23 PB 3036: Commission of a crime (off duty)--Motion to withdraw charges taken under advisement (Respondent resigned from the CPD)

No. 24 PB 3037: Used deadly force without justification--April 10 at 9:30am (status hearing)

Rulings on COPA/CPD Disagreements on Discipline

When the Chief Administrator and the Superintendent of Police do not agree regarding discipline of a Department member, the Chief Administrator shall refer the matter to a member of the Police Board.

The reviewing member shall then rule on the disagreement between the Chief Administrator and the Superintendent, as follows:

  • If, in the opinion of the reviewing member, the Superintendent’s response did not meet the burden of overcoming the Chief Administrator’s recommendation for discipline, the recommendation shall be deemed to be accepted by the Superintendent.
  • If, in the opinion of the reviewing member, the Superintendent’s response met the burden of overcoming the Chief Administrator’s recommendation for discipline, the Superintendent's response shall be implemented.

The reviewing member must recuse her/himself from any future involvement with such case by the full Police Board.

This review process is set forth in Section 2-78-130 of the Civilian Office of Police Accountability (COPA) ordinance and in Article VI of the Police Board Rules of Procedure.

The rulings of reviewing members are posted below, as required by the COPA ordinance.

Go to the Archives for the decisions from previous years.

Department Main Office

Chicago Police Board

I Want To